Case 2204592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Isaacs, counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204592/2020
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr O Isaacs, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter hearing oral evidence from the claimant and Ms J Davies, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages under section 13 ERA 1996 on 9 April 2020 and 21 May 2020, in the sums of £1,056.16 and £1,076.16. Those deductions had already been paid by the respondent, so no repayment order was needed for that part of the case.
The tribunal also found that the respondent paid wages on 20 April 2020 and 21 May 2020 without providing a written itemised pay statement as required by section 8 ERA 1996. It recorded unnotified deductions of £620.32 from those payments and ordered the respondent to pay £400 within 28 days, without deductions for tax or national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 on 9 April 2020 and 21 May 2020 in the sums of £1,056.16 and £1,076.16. It recorded that those deductions had since been paid, so no payment order was required in respect of them. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that wages paid on 20 April 2020 and 21 May 2020 were not accompanied by a written itemised pay statement required by section 8 ERA 1996. It recorded unnotified deductions of £620.32 from those payments and ordered the respondent to pay £400 within 28 days, without deductions for tax or national insurance. | Upheld | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £400
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.