Case 2204593/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Railbookers UK Trading Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204593/2019
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this telephone preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Nicolle on 8 July 2020, the Claimant, Ms E Rochester, gave notice withdrawing her unfair dismissal claim. The reason recorded was that she did not have the required two years' continuity of employment.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. No monetary award was recorded in this judgment.
The judgment also states, for the avoidance of doubt, that the Claimant's claims of dismissal on account of having made a protected disclosure, race and sex, and failure to provide a written statement of statutorily required employment particulars, were to proceed. Those claims were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Claimant gave notice of withdrawal of the unfair dismissal claim because she did not have the required two years' continuity of employment; the tribunal therefore dismissed that claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.