Case 2204637/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Obeng v DOC Cleaning Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204637/2021
- Decision date
- 30 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Obeng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs B Obeng brought claims of constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages against Doc Cleaning Limited. The tribunal found that the early NMG pay complaint from 2018-19 had been resolved by 17 April 2019 and could not be relied on as a continuing breach. It accepted the respondent's evidence that later changes to Bannatyne, Momenta, Forest Brown, Shook Hardy and Bacon and DVB Bank work were client-led contract variations that the claimant signed, and it rejected the allegation that signatures had been forged. The tribunal also found that the claimant was not spoken to aggressively about the Momenta hours and that the complaint raised in December 2020 was handled informally, with the claimant given the opportunity to escalate it formally or meet the Operations Director if she wished.
The tribunal found that the claimant's resignation on 20 May 2021 did not follow any repudiatory breach by the respondent. It accepted the respondent's account of the 17 May 2021 telephone call, including that the claimant said she would not return to work and would contact her solicitor, and it rejected the allegation that Ms Oliva was acting aggressively. On that basis, there was no constructive dismissal within section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996 and the constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
On the pay claims, the tribunal held that the complaints relating to alleged deductions before August 2019 were out of jurisdiction under section 23(4A) ERA 1996. It held that the later complaints from May 2020 to May 2021 were presented in time as series claims, including the furlough and holiday pay complaints, but it found there was insufficient evidence that any further sums were properly payable and unpaid. The tribunal therefore found no unlawful deductions from wages, including no proven shortfall in holiday pay, and dismissed the claim in full.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found no repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, no dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996, and no basis for the claimed 'last straw' in May 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The first two alleged deductions, said to pre-date August 2019, were time-barred under section 23(4A) ERA 1996. The remaining complaints from May 2020 to May 2021 were held to be in time as series claims, but the tribunal found no unauthorised deductions proved. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Malik and Mahmud v BCCI
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- LB of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23(2)-(4A) ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland and Ors v Fulton and Ors
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.