Case 2204656/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. C. Peng v Yanfeng Liu — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204656/2021
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. C. Peng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal therefore considered the ET1 and, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, determined the claim without a hearing. The listed hearing on 21 October 2021 did not take place.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages owed. It ordered the respondent to pay a total of £5,749, made up of sums for March 2020 (£1,179), April 2021 (£1,129), May 2021 (£1,156), June 2021 (£1,129) and July 2021 (£1,129). The judgment also ordered the respondent to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance and the tribunal determined the claim on the ET1 without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £5,749 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,749
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.