Case 2204670/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Levinaite v Chase Hammond Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 2204670/2020
Decision date: 7 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Elliott

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Levinaite v Chase Hammond Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent, Chase Hammond Limited, failed to enter a Response. The tribunal therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant, Ms V Levinaite, without an attended hearing on liability. The judgment records two monetary awards: £213.70 for notice pay and £641.10 for accrued holiday pay.

The notice pay element is recorded as a separate sum and is treated here as a breach of contract award. The holiday pay element is recorded separately as accrued holiday pay. No additional reasoning, findings on contested facts, or detailed legal analysis are set out in the extracted judgment text.

The judgment does not break the award into broader compensation categories such as basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings. The total award is £854.80.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Awarded as notice pay under a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response.	Upheld	—	£214
Holiday pay	Awarded in respect of accrued holiday pay under a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response.	Upheld	—	£641

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £855; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.