Case 2204706/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. S Burger v Louise Parker Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204706/2021
- Decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. S Burger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade therefore determined the claim on the ET1 and decided it could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay owed to the claimant. No further factual detail or legal analysis is set out in the extracted judgment beyond that finding.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, Louise Parker Limited, to pay Ms S Burger £6,386.54 gross and to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on that amount. The listed hearing on 26 October 2021 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to file an ET3. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay owed to the claimant and ordered payment of £6,386.54 gross, with the respondent to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance due on that sum. | Upheld | — | £6,387 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,387
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.