Case 2204741/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Poulter v Ealing Eventide Homes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204741/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
- Venue
- in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Poulter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records that Mrs K Poulter was dismissed on 18 August 2021. The tribunal heard the matter in public by CVP on 16 September 2021 before Employment Judge Adkin, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a litigation consultant.
The only substantive decision recorded is that the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. The judgment does not set out the detailed factual or legal reasoning for that decision in the text provided.
Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy award is recorded in the written judgment excerpt.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that the claimant was dismissed on 18 August 2021 and that her application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. It does not set out the substantive underlying claim in this short judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.