Case 2204744/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Carr v GeoAmey PECS UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204744/2021
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Carr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at London Central on 5 April 2022 before Tribunal Judge McGrade sitting alone. The claimant, Mrs N Carr, did not attend. The respondent was represented by T Cross. The tribunal had an email from the claimant, sent on 4 April 2022, stating: 'I will not be proceeding with this case.'
The clerk attempted to contact the claimant by telephone and by email on the morning of the hearing, but there was no response. After considering the available information about the claimant's absence, the tribunal exercised its power under Rule 47 and dismissed the claims.
The judgment states that the claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract, including the notice pay element, were dismissed. No merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the hearing and had emailed the day before saying, 'I will not be proceeding with this case.' | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was dismissed under Rule 47 for the same non-attendance/non-prosecution reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.