In person For the v Respondent — 2022

Case reference: 2204745/2021
Decision date: 13 June 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt only with strike-out applications. The claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim, described in the judgment as unpaid wages, was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found that it had no reasonable prospects of success.

The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the written judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success.	Struck out	—	—
Holiday pay	Respondent's application to strike out the holiday pay claim under Rule 37(1)(a) was dismissed; the substantive holiday pay claim was not finally determined in this judgment.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.