Case 2204747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v London Elizabeth Hotel (2014) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204747/2019
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 January 2020 at London Central, Employment Judge Burns entered judgment under Rule 21 because The London Elizabeth Hotel had not entered a response. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Miss C Orban £1,208.50, described as one month's gross salary, within 14 days.
The tribunal also dealt with holiday pay, but did not quantify that sum in the judgment. It directed the claimant to provide a calculation and explanation of the holiday pay due by 27 January 2020 if she wanted the tribunal to quantify it, and warned that if she did not do so the file would be closed and no further action would be taken. The hearing listed for 4 March 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment was entered because the respondent failed to enter a response. The tribunal ordered payment of one month's gross salary of £1,208.50 within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £1,209 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered holiday pay to be paid if and when it had been quantified by the tribunal. The claimant was directed to send a calculation and explanation of the sums due by 27 January 2020, failing which the file would be closed. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.