Case 2204759/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Dr H Fatoyinbo v Orphidia Ltd Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204759/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr H Fatoyinbo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record for this case states that Dr H Fatoyinbo's claims were submitted within the statutory time limits. The hearing took place on 15 June 2021 by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Davidson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not appearing.
No substantive merits findings, liability conclusions, or monetary award are set out in the extracted text. The record is limited to the timeliness point and the administrative note that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted written record does not record a merits finding or final disposal for this claim; it only states that the claimant's claims were submitted within the statutory time limits. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted written record does not record a merits finding or final disposal for this claim; it only states that the claimant's claims were submitted within the statutory time limits. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.