Case 2204761/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Collins v Pello Capital Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204761/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Central London Employment Tribunal on 7 November 2022, Employment Judge Norris, sitting alone via CVP, heard Mr R Collins's claim against Pello Capital Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and pay in lieu of notice was well-founded and succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay £6,082.19, with tax and employee National Insurance to be deducted first. The judgment does not split that figure between the wages and notice-pay elements, and it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's unpaid wages claim was well-founded. The judgment does not split the £6,082.19 award between the wages and notice-pay elements. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also held that the pay in lieu of notice element succeeded. The judgment does not allocate a separate sum to this head. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,082
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.