Case 2204778/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Amir Dhawan v Infinite Software Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204778/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Amir Dhawan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent dated 13 January 2022 before Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten sitting at London Central by CVP. The Claimant, Mr Amir Dhawan, and the Respondent, Infinite Software Limited, both appeared in person. The tribunal recorded that, by consent, the Claimant’s claims succeeded and that the Respondent unlawfully deducted wages and holiday pay from him.
The judgment states that the Respondent must pay £6,968.88 net in total. That figure is made up of unlawful deduction from wages of £6,461.19, broken down as April 2021 £2,409.89, May 2021 £2,409.89, and June 2021 £1,641.41, together with unpaid holiday pay of £507.69, calculated as 3.3 days at £153.85. The judgment also records that the Respondent must account to HMRC for tax and national insurance due on the gross sum as set out in the Claimant’s relevant wage slips.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the Respondent unlawfully deducted wages. The judgment lists April 2021 (£2,409.89), May 2021 (£2,409.89) and June 2021 (£1,641.41), totalling £6,461.19. | Upheld | — | £6,461 |
| Working time regulations | By consent, the Claimant also succeeded in his unpaid holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment calculates 3.3 days at £153.85, totalling £507.69. | Upheld | — | £508 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,969
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.