Case 2204784/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Payne Records Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204784/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. The tribunal therefore determined the claim under rule 21 on the basis of the ET1 and found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant.
The judgment ordered payment of three wage components: 775.72 net wages for July/August, 509 net for August/September overtime, and 532 gross for September, with deductions for tax and National Insurance to be made as appropriate on the gross sum. The judgment also stated that the tribunal had jurisdiction to award compensation for expenses arising from the failure to pay wages if the claimant later provided a figure and supporting evidence, in which event the judgment could be varied.
The listed hearing on 9 March 2020 was vacated because judgment had been given and the parties were told not to attend. The judgment does not record any further awarded sum for expenses or interest.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the papers after the respondent failed to file an ET3. The tribunal ordered payment of July/August net wages of 775.72, August/September overtime of 509 net, and September wages of 532 gross, subject to deductions for tax and NI as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £1,817 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,817
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.