Case 2204784/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Werenowski, Counsel For the v Ms M Langen, Solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204784/2023
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Werenowski, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Brown on 7 July 2023. The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claim had been presented out of time.
The Tribunal decided it was not just and equitable to extend time for the claim. On that basis, it held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it.
The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action beyond describing it as the Claimant's claim. It also records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive legal basis of the claim in the extracted text. The Tribunal found it was presented out of time, that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.