Case 2204791/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Cabey v Bryanston Logistics — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204791/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Cabey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 January 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr K Cabey an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Wade ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits of the claim and no monetary award.
The only reason given is procedural: the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not shown why strike out should not follow. The judgment was sent to the parties on 22 August 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the reasons; the case listing is Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so by letter dated 5 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.