Case 2204818/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ahmad Tawfiq Kohistani v Mohammed Sadique Keloth and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204818/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Ahmad Tawfiq Kohistani
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote CVP hearing on 12 April 2021, Employment Judge Nicklin gave oral reasons and recorded that Mohammed Sadique Keloth was not the claimant's employer. On that basis, the claim against the first respondent was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the claim against Grand Store Limited was stayed after the company was dissolved on 6 April 2021. No monetary award or other remedy was made in the decision record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that Mohammed Sadique Keloth was not the claimant's employer, so the claim against him was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against Grand Store Limited was stayed because the company had been dissolved on 6 April 2021. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.