Case 2204833/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Zakwan Malik v Maven Leisure Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204833/2023
- Decision date
- 12 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Zakwan Malik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Zakwan Malik’s claims against Maven Leisure Limited were all dismissed at a hearing on 12 October 2023 before Employment Judge Hutchings. The claimant did not attend. The judgment records that the unauthorised deductions complaint concerned wages of 1.5 hours, and the breach of contract complaint concerned a referral bonus.
The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deductions claim, the breach of contract claim, and the complaint under the Working Time Regulations 1998 because each had not been presented within the applicable time limit. In each of those claims, the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.
The race discrimination, religious/belief discrimination, and age discrimination complaints were also dismissed on time-limit grounds. For those complaints, the tribunal found they were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned wages of 1.5 hours. The tribunal found it was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned a referral bonus. The tribunal found it was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Complaint under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found to be out of time and the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal found the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal found the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.