Case 2204853/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D. Godfrey, Camden Community Law Centre For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2204853/2018
- Decision date
- 15 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr. D. Godfrey, Camden Community Law Centre For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by telephone before Employment Judge Goodman on 8 March 2019. The claimant was Ms T. Kasongo and the respondent was Humanscale UK Ltd. Mr D. Godfrey of Camden Community Law Centre appeared for the claimant and Mr D. Cunnington, counsel, appeared for the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for unlawful deductions was dismissed on withdrawal pursuant to rule 52. No monetary award was recorded in relation to that claim.
The judgment also records that the pregnancy discrimination claim was listed for final hearing on 17 and 18 September 2019. No liability finding was made on that claim in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deductions was dismissed on withdrawal pursuant to rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.