Case 2204863/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brown v Oliver Marketing Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204863/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Quill, sitting alone by telephone, dismissed all claims and complaints under case number 2204863/2019. The tribunal found that this case number was a duplication created by administrative error, so the dismissal was procedural rather than a determination of the merits of any underlying complaint.
The judgment expressly stated that the decision did not affect any claims or complaints allocated any other case number. No remedy was awarded, and no substantive findings were made on the merits of any discrimination or other claim in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim types in the text provided. It states that all claims and complaints under this case number were dismissed because the case number was a duplication created by administrative error, and that the decision did not affect any claims or complaints allocated another case number. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.