Case 2204869/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. R MacGowan v Stranos Linen Collection Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204869/2021
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. R MacGowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 response form. Employment Judge Glennie therefore determined the claim without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules, on the basis of the ET1 and the absence of a response.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded. It ordered Stranos Linen Collection Ltd to pay Ms R MacGowan £6,713.19 and to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on that amount.
The judgment also records that the claim was amended to include sums sought by the claimant since presenting the claim in September 2021. The extracted judgment does not break out any additional sum beyond the stated award of £6,713.19.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the papers after the respondent failed to file an ET3 response. The tribunal found the unlawful deduction from wages complaint well founded and ordered payment of £6,713.19; it also said the claim was amended to include sums sought since presentation in September 2021, but no separate additional amount was specified. | Upheld | — | £6,713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,713
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.