Case 2204871/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v SMB Housekeeping Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204871/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment. The respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance, and Employment Judge JL Wade decided the claim could properly be determined on the ET1 without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant notice pay and redundancy pay. The judgment does not set out any dispute on the facts, and no hearing took place.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £1,556.25. That sum was made up of notice pay of £1,245 gross, or the net equivalent, and redundancy pay of £311.25. The hearing listed for 11 December 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay notice pay. The award was £1,245 gross, or the net equivalent. | Upheld | — | £1,245 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,556
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.