Case 2204883/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Ismail v Squarestop Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204883/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Ismail
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Ismail brought a claim against Squarestop Limited (in voluntary liquidation) in the London Central Employment Tribunal. Employment Judge Khan heard the case on 14 January 2020 and the respondent did not appear.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The amount identified in the judgment was £201.14.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £201.14 to the claimant within 28 days. No other remedy components are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £201.14 within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £201 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £201
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.