Case 2204913/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Varsani v Seed Property Consultants Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204913/2019
- Decision date
- 24 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Varsani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Quill Date found that Mr H Varsani had been constructively dismissed with effect from 31 July 2019. The tribunal also found an unauthorised deduction from wages for June and July 2019 and ordered payment of £4,500 gross, described as two months at £2,250 per month.
The tribunal further held that the claimant had been constructively dismissed in breach of contract as to notice and awarded £1,812 net for one month's net pay based on a gross salary of £27,000 per year. It found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,076.92, and that holiday entitlement had not been paid, with £675 gross ordered for the outstanding holiday.
The separate claim concerning breach of a loan agreement between the claimant and the company and/or its director was held to be outside the employment tribunal's jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed with effect from 31 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages for June and July 2019 and was ordered to pay £4,500 gross, described as two months at £2,250 per month. | Upheld | — | £4,500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a constructive dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,812 net for one month's net pay, based on a gross salary of £27,000 per year. | Upheld | — | £1,812 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,076.92, using weekly pay of £519.23 and a multiplier of 4. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £675 gross, calculated on 6.5 days' holiday remaining after 6 days had been used. | Upheld | — | £675 |
| Other | The claim alleging breach of a loan agreement between the claimant and the company and/or its director was held to be outside the employment tribunal's jurisdiction. | Other |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,064
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.