Case 2204915/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Wiltshire, counsel (i11-13 April) Mr D Rice, solicitor (20 April 2022) For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204915/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Spencer
- Panel members
- Mr G Bishop, Mr A Adolphus
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr H Wiltshire, counsel (i11-13 April) Mr D Rice, solicitor (20 April 2022) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously upheld the claimant's disability discrimination complaint under sections 15 and 57 of the Equality Act 2010 in two respects: delay in providing the outcome of an investigation into a complaint made about her, and standing her down from union duties from 14 March to 1 June 2020. The judgment records that the remaining section 15 allegations failed and were dismissed.
The victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal awarded £9,000 for injury to feelings in respect of the successful parts of the claim.
Interest was awarded at 8% from 14 February 2020 to 20 April 2022, amounting to £1,570.19. The tribunal stated that the Recoupment Regulations 1996 did not apply and ordered the respondent to pay £10,570.19 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal upheld the disability discrimination claim under sections 15 and 57 of the Equality Act 2010 in respect of (i) a delay in providing the outcome of an investigation into a complaint made about the claimant and (ii) standing her down from union duties from 14 March to 1 June 2020. | Upheld | Disability | £9,000 |
| Disability discrimination | The remaining section 15 allegations failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,570
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 15 and 57 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.