Case 2204991/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Garside v Strategic Agenda UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204991/2023
- Decision date
- 25 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker Representation
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Garside
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a breach of contract claim for notice pay after his employment with Strategic Agenda UK Limited ended. The tribunal recorded that he started work on 9 February 2023 as a full stack developer under a contract requiring normal weekday hours and a hybrid pattern with at least three days a week in the office.
The tribunal found that the events of 15 March 2023 did not amount to a wilful refusal to obey an instruction. The claimant missed an initial meeting invitation, saw the reminder only when he logged on later that morning, apologised for missing it, and the tribunal accepted that there had been confusion over the timing of the emails. It also found that the allegation put forward in the disciplinary process was not framed in quite the same way as the later reasons given for dismissal.
The decisive conduct was the claimant's failure to attend work on 16 March 2023 after being instructed to come in the next day. The tribunal found there was no explanation for that absence and concluded that, in the circumstances, it was a wilful refusal to obey a proper instruction and a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. It rejected the argument that the respondent had waived the breach, finding that the disciplinary process moved forward promptly and that a brief discussion about alternative working arrangements at the end of the hearing did not amount to acceptance of the conduct.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the respondent was entitled to accept the breach and end the contract without notice pay. The claim for notice pay therefore failed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim was for notice pay only; the tribunal held the claimant's failure to attend work on 16 March 2023 was a wilful refusal to obey a proper instruction and a fundamental breach, so no notice pay was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- fundamental breach of contract
- wilful refusal to obey a proper instruction
- Briscoe v Lubrizol Limited
- Neary and another v Dean of Westminster
- Laws v London Chronicle (Indicator Newspapers) Limited
- Pepper v Webb
- Wilson v Racher
- Bartholomew v LK Group Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.