Case 2204995/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Abousalah v Alghad TV Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2204995/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Professor
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Abousalah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central before Employment Judge Professor A C Neal, heard the case on 12, 13 and 14 December 2018 and 28 and 31 January 2019. The claimant was represented by Miss M Stanley of Counsel and the respondent by Ms L Prince of Counsel.
The tribunal found that Mr J Abousalah was not an employee of Alghad TV Limited. On that basis, his claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee of the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee of the respondent, so the breach of contract claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.