Case 2205001/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Siobhan Redmond v Swish News Limited Swish A Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205001/2023
- Decision date
- 6 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Siobhan Redmond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Webster Date upheld Ms Siobhan Redmond’s claims for unpaid wages and breach of contract against Swish News Limited and Swish A Limited. The judgment records gross amounts for unpaid wages for 20/10/2022 to 12/12/2023, expenses and meal allowance, accrued but untaken holiday, unpaid pension contributions, and overtime worked but not paid.
The judgment states that the total payable by the respondents to the claimant is £6,096.95. It does not split that total between the claims. The itemised figures in the extracted text are listed individually, but the judgment itself gives only the overall payable sum and notes that the amounts are expressed in gross figures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment upholds the claim for unpaid wages. It does not apportion the award between claims, and the itemised gross figures in the text do not arithmetically match the total payable stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment upholds the breach of contract claim. It does not apportion the award between claims, and the itemised gross figures in the text do not arithmetically match the total payable stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,097
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.