Case 2205002/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Hannah Knight v Swish News Limited Swish A Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205002/2023
- Decision date
- 6 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Hannah Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Webster Date upheld Ms Hannah Knight's claims for unpaid wages and breach of contract against Swish News Limited and Swish A Limited. The judgment states that the amounts payable were assessed on a gross basis.
The tribunal ordered payment of £3,723.20 for unpaid wages covering 21/11/2022 to 04/01/2023, £581.73 for one week's notice pay, £371.85 for expenses and meal allowance, £52.36 for accrued but untaken holiday, and £186.16 for unpaid pension contributions. The total payable to the claimant was £4,910.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment upheld the Claimant's claim for unpaid wages. The monetary items were not split by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment upheld the Claimant's breach of contract claim. The awarded sums included notice pay, expenses and meal allowance, accrued untaken holiday, and unpaid pension contributions, but the text does not allocate those items between the claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,910
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.