Case 2205014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr G Somefun, director — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205014/2019
- Decision date
- 27 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. Instead, Employment Judge Spencer recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties, on terms confidential to the parties and noted on the file, at the hearing on 27 January 2020.
The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn on compliance with that agreement on or before 3 February 2020. It also provided that if the agreement were not complied with, the claimant could apply to have the claim restored on or before 10 February 2020.
The judgment further stated that if no application to restore was made by that date, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No monetary award was made and no substantive findings on liability were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties, confidential to them and noted on the file. The claim was withdrawn on compliance with that agreement on or before 3 February 2020. The judgment also states that if there were no application to restore by 10 February 2020, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.