Case 2205020/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Onico Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205020/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Adkin therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 without a hearing. The tribunal held that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant, unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay, and failed to pay notice in breach of contract.
On unfair dismissal, the reasons record an effective date of termination of 31 August 2020, although the compensation calculation refers to the claimant not having worked since 31 August 2019 and to losses running to 31 August 2020. The basic award was calculated by reference to 5 weeks at the capped weekly rate of £525, producing £3,937.50, described as equivalent to a statutory redundancy payment. The compensatory award was based on an assumed net monthly pay of £6,241.32 and a period to 31 August 2020, producing £74,895.84 before deduction for overlap with notice pay; after deducting £25,000, the compensatory award was £49,895.84.
For breach of contract, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled under her contract to three months' notice. That sum was calculated at £30,501.01 on the basis of monthly pay of £10,166.67, but it was capped at £25,000 by article 10 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. Holiday pay for the period January to August 2019 was assessed at £7,507.20. The total ordered to be paid was £86,340.54.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons state that the effective date of termination was 31 August 2020, but the compensation calculation refers to the claimant not having worked since 31 August 2019 and to losses running to 31 August 2020. | Upheld | — | £53,833 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for holiday pay claimed for the period January to August 2019. | Upheld | — | £7,507 |
| Breach of contract | This was the unpaid notice pay element; the contractual three months' pay was calculated at £30,501.01 but capped at £25,000 under article 10 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £86,341
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,938
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £49,896
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.