Case 2205029/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Simpson v Transport for London — 2025
- Case reference
- 2205029/2023
- Decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central on 15, 16, 17 and 18 July 2025 by Employment Judge B Smith sitting alone. The claimant, Miss R Simpson, did not attend. Transport for London was represented by Mr J Davies, Counsel. The tribunal issued a unanimous judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of direct race discrimination was found not to have been presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time. In the alternative, the claim was dismissed on the merits. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint of direct age discrimination was found not to have been presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time. In the alternative, the claim was dismissed on the merits. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.