Case 2205076/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Spencer v Funding Options Ltd. — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205076/2019
- Decision date
- 19 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Spencer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was Mr D Spencer and the respondent was Funding Options Limited.
The only substantive outcome recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not include any findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, and it does not identify any liability findings against the respondent.
No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures were recorded in the judgment. The extracted text does not contain lay members or any additional factual reasoning beyond the dismissal after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings or separate remedy were set out. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings or separate remedy were set out. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.