Case 2205137/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Pellegrini v Cover Genuis Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2205137/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Pellegrini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out both claims. For case 2216105/2023, the tribunal had warned that it had no jurisdiction because the allegations fell outside the employment tribunal's jurisdiction. For case 2205137/2023, the tribunal had warned that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, had not been actively pursued, had not complied with the tribunal's order of 8 December 2023, and that the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the claimant had been unreasonable.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not attend the CVP hearing on 22 February 2024, despite being given notice of the hearing on three occasions. The tribunal also referred to emails and other documents relied on by the respondent when accepting the respondent's argument that there had been a course of vexatious conduct since dismissal.
The claimant had not provided information requested by the tribunal by 22 December 2023 and said he was not prepared to provide it. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing includes breach of contract. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The gov.uk listing includes redundancy. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing includes sex discrimination. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing includes unfair dismissal. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing includes unlawful deduction from wages. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing includes Working Time Regulations. The short judgment states that both claims are struck out but does not give particulars or allocate claim types between case numbers. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.