Case 2205140/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine and others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205140/2018
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDr R J Heal's claims against respondents 2, 3 and 4 had been withdrawn, and the tribunal dismissed those claims. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the merits of those claims.
The claim against respondent 7, Health Education England, was not dismissed at this stage because an application had been made under rule 34 to add that respondent back in. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims against respondents 2, 3 and 4 had been withdrawn before this judgment and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim against respondent 7, Health Education England, was not dismissed at this stage because an application had been made under rule 34 to add that respondent back in. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.