Case 2205207/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Education Dream Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205207/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Education Dream Limited, did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Adkin therefore determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, and the listed hearing for 1 May 2020 did not take place.
On the material before the tribunal, the claim succeeded. The judgment states that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant, Mr K Begum.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £825.18. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance, and the tribunal decided the claim on the papers without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £825 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £825
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £825
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.