Case 2205230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205230/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing. The respondent applied under Rule 37 for the claimant's claim to be struck out, relying on alleged unreasonable conduct of the proceedings, failure to pursue the claim, and failure to comply with tribunal orders. The tribunal refused that application.
The tribunal found that the claimant's capacity to conduct the litigation had been affected by her mental health, which the respondent conceded amounted to disability under the Equality Act 2010. Although there had been substantial delay and previous non-compliance, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant's conduct was deliberately unreasonable, inexcusable, or contumelious. It considered the case trial-ready apart from the claimant's witness statement and concluded that the prejudice to the claimant from strike out outweighed the prejudice to the respondent from delay.
The tribunal made an unless order requiring the claimant to serve her witness statement by 20 February 2023. It also granted an amendment adding a section 15 disability discrimination complaint, finding it was largely a relabelling exercise grounded in the original pleadings. The claimant withdrew her proposed amendment to add an indirect disability discrimination complaint under section 19 after the tribunal explained the required elements and the respondent's objection.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend the claim to add a complaint under section 15 Equality Act 2010. The merits of the complaint were not determined in this preliminary hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew her application to amend the claim to add an indirect disability discrimination complaint under section 19 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal did not determine the merits of such a complaint. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.