Case 2205518/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Hirsch Sharma (Accountant) v Pawlus Construction Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2205518/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heydon Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Hirsch Sharma (Accountant)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central on 2 December 2022 before Employment Judge Heydon. The respondent did not appear. The judgment records that the three claimants were made redundant by the respondent employer.
The tribunal held that each claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment, all figures being gross. The amounts ordered were £3,461.52 for Andrzej Pawlus, £1,473.74 for Anna Pawlus, and £1,104.92 for Bogdan Zarzycki. No separate legal test or additional remedy analysis is set out in the written record beyond the award of those redundancy payments.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the three claimants were made redundant by the respondent employer and were entitled to redundancy payments. Gross amounts awarded were: Andrzej Pawlus £3,461.52; Anna Pawlus £1,473.74; and Bogdan Zarzycki £1,104.92. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,040
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.