Case 2205567/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Mr P Stachurski v Filimonov Restaurants Ltd t/a Heritage — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205567/2020
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Mr P Stachurski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Filimonov Restaurants Ltd t/a Heritage was in breach of contract because it had not paid Mr P Stachurski the full amount of his one week's notice and 15.53 days of accrued but untaken holiday. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,351.17 as damages for breach of contract.
The written record states that the remainder of the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. No further written reasoning is provided in the extracted judgment text, and the decision was recorded by Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone at a remote hearing on 28 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of one week's notice and 15.53 days of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £2,351 |
| Working time regulations | The written decision states that the rest of the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment text does not separately identify the dismissed head, but the case listing included working time regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,351
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.