Case 2205580/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brittenden, counsel For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205580/2022
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Brittenden, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that Ms P Anning was a "worker" for the purposes of section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, applying limb (b) of the relevant definition. On that basis, Pearson Education Limited was ordered to pay £5,320 in respect of the claimant's holiday pay claim under section 23 ERA 1996 and regulation 30 WTR 1998.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claims in case number 2205580/2022 were dismissed on withdrawal. There was no order as to costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined by consent; the respondent was ordered to pay £5,320 on the holiday pay claim under section 23 ERA 1996 and regulation 30 WTR 1998. | Upheld | — | £5,320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,320
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 230(3)(b) ERA 1996
- regulation 2 WTR 1998
- section 23 ERA 1996
- regulation 30 WTR 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.