Case 2205678/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Blay v Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205678/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smailes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Blay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Blay brought a claim for unfair dismissal against Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The hearing took place remotely by video before Employment Judge Smailes sitting alone on 29 and 30 April 2021.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasoning because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment record also notes that the hearing was conducted remotely by CVP because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was 'not well founded' and dismissed it. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.