Case 2205690/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C McDonough v Cube Management Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2205690/2019
- Decision date
- 19 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr M Reuby, Mr G Bishop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C McDonough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central Employment Tribunal by Employment Judge Khan sitting with lay members Mr M Reuby and Mr G Bishop. The tribunal unanimously held that Miss C McDonough succeeded in part on her complaint of discrimination arising from disability: only the allegation concerning the threat of disciplinary action on 6 August 2019 was upheld, and the other two alleged detriments within that complaint were dismissed.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments, finding that Cube Management Services Ltd should have made the adjustment of homeworking from 19 July 2019. It further upheld the complaint of indirect disability discrimination. Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent did not fail to comply with a relevant ACAS Code of Practice. The extracted record does not state any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability. The tribunal upheld this complaint only in part, finding that the threat of disciplinary action on 6 August 2019 was a detriment arising from disability. The other two alleged detriments under this complaint were dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal upheld the complaint and found that the respondent should have made the adjustment of allowing homeworking from 19 July 2019. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination. The tribunal upheld this complaint. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent did not fail to comply with a relevant ACAS Code of Practice. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.