Case 2205695/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Yardley v Code Investing Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205695/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Yardley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Grewal heard the case at London Central on 27 November 2020. The Respondent, Code Investing Ltd (In Liquidation), did not appear. The tribunal recorded that the Respondent was to pay the Claimant, Mr N Yardley, £65,020.02 gross for deductions from pay made in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also awarded Mr Yardley £3,711.56 in damages for breach of contract. The judgment does not set out further reasoning in the extracted text, but it records both claims as successful and fixes the monetary sums payable on each head. The combined amount of the awards is £68,731.58.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £65,020.02 gross for deductions made from pay in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £65,020 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded £3,711.56 damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £3,712 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £68,732
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.