Case 2205723/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Neither present nor represented v Mr J Dale (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205723/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Neither present nor represented
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 1 September 2021 before Employment Judge Glennie, the claimant was neither present nor represented. The respondent was represented by Mr J Dale, solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued, the claimant had not complied with orders of the tribunal, and/or the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the claimant had been unreasonable.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying disability discrimination and unfair dismissal complaints. No remedy was awarded, and the written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the proceedings under rule 37(1) and did not determine the merits of the underlying disability discrimination complaint. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the proceedings under rule 37(1) and did not determine the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.