Case 2205726/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T. Parsons-Munn (counsel) First v Not in attendance Second Respondent: Not in attendance — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205726/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T. Parsons-Munn (counsel) First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claims in case numbers 2205726/2020, 2205727/2020, 2205728/2020, 2205729/2020, 2205730/2020, 2205731/2020, 2205712/2020, 2205711/2020 and 2205713/2020, brought under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188, were well-founded. It made protective awards under section 189(3) for employees dismissed on 14 May 2020 from the London Heathrow Terminal 4 and Terminal 5 restaurants, and for employees dismissed on 13 May 2020 from the London Smithfield restaurant, each for remuneration for a 90-day protected period beginning on the relevant dismissal date.
The claims numbered 2205694/2020, 2205695/20, 2205696/20, 2205697/20 and 2205698/20 were found not well-founded and dismissed. Claim 2205555/2020 was withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations apply. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
15 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case no. 2205555/2020. The claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2205726/2020. Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; well-founded. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a 90-day protected period, but no individual sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2205727/2020. Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; well-founded. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a 90-day protected period, but no individual sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2205728/2020. Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; well-founded. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a 90-day protected period, but no individual sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2205729/2020. Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; well-founded. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a 90-day protected period, but no individual sum is stated in the extracted text. |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(3) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.