Case 2205735/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Green v Decisive Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205735/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment for case 2205735/2019 records that Mr C Green’s complaints of a failure to pay a redundancy payment, "other payments" and "another type of claim" were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not identify any substantive findings on those complaints because they were withdrawn rather than determined on the merits.
The same judgment notes that the remaining complaints in the claim were to proceed to a hearing. No liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in this document, and no monetary figure is stated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the complaint of a failure to pay a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records that the complaint described as "other payments" was dismissed on withdrawal; the specific legal classification is not identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records that the complaint described as "another type of claim" was dismissed on withdrawal; the specific legal classification is not identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.