Case 2205761/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v St Cuthbert with St Matthias Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205761/2020
- Decision date
- 19 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at London Central on 18 February 2021 before Employment Judge F Spencer. The parties did not object to the remote hearing, which took place because of the Covid-19 pandemic and the closure of London Central Tribunal.
The judgment records only one substantive finding: the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the Claimant’s claims because they were presented out of time. On that basis, the claims were dismissed.
No written reasons were provided in the record supplied beyond that jurisdictional ruling, so the judgment does not set out separate findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment record does not identify this claim separately; classification is based on the case listing. The tribunal said the Claimant’s claims were presented out of time and dismissed them for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment record does not set out the detailed pleadings for this claim; classification is based on the case listing. The tribunal said the Claimant’s claims were presented out of time and dismissed them for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.