Case 2205781/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Bennbridge Services LLP and Others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205781/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in London Central by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Gidney on 31 July 2023, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondents represented by Ms Alice Mayhew KC. The only determination recorded in the written judgment was that the Claimant's interim relief application was refused.
The judgment states that the reasons for the refusal were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties. No further findings on the underlying claims are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal heard the Claimant's interim relief application at a preliminary hearing on 31 July 2023 and refused it. The written judgment does not set out further reasons, stating that oral reasons were given at the hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.