Case 2205782/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Omolorun v Corps Security (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205782/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Omolorun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed for conduct, namely leaving the site where he was working as a security officer before the end of his shift on 7 April 2020 without a relieving security officer in place. The tribunal found that the respondent required two officers to be on site at all times after 25 March 2020, one in each block, and that any flexible shift arrangement only allowed an officer to leave once cover had arrived. The claimant knew of that requirement.
The tribunal accepted that the initial investigation into the early departure allegation was limited, but found that the defect was cured during the disciplinary and appeal stages. At those stages, the claimant was asked about his account, the respondent checked that account with his supervisor, reviewed CCTV and other records, and the appeal manager carried out further enquiries. The tribunal found that, taken as a whole, the investigation and procedure were reasonable.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent had a genuine belief in the claimant's misconduct on reasonable grounds, and that summary dismissal for knowingly leaving the site without cover was within the band of reasonable responses. The holiday pay claim was withdrawn and dismissed on that basis. As the unfair dismissal claim failed, the tribunal did not consider remedy issues including Polkey, contribution or any ACAS adjustment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- Post Office v Foley
- band of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited v Hitt
- London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small
- Taylor v OCS Group
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.