Case 2205808/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For v Mr Andre Frullo, HR Manager — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205808/2020
- Decision date
- 22 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Surasak Sukthong, brought a claim for holiday pay said to be worth £1,100, representing three weeks' holiday pay. The respondent's defence was that the claimant had signed a contract of employment containing a term said to prohibit rolling over accrued holiday from one holiday year to the next, and that the respondent would need to locate and produce that signed contract to establish the defence.
The judgment records that the respondent had failed to find and produce a signed contract or copy of it. It also records the respondent's admission that the claimant's request to take rolled-over holiday was initially approved by his immediate manager but later declined by the Director of the business, relying on the alleged term.
By consent, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £550 in full and final satisfaction of his holiday pay claim. No further substantive findings, legal test, or separate breakdown of remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records a claim advanced for £1,100, described as the agreed value of 3 weeks' holiday pay. It was resolved by consent with an order that the respondent pay £550 in full and final satisfaction of the claim. | Settled | — | £550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.